I
like to be fashionably late to a party, unless it is an actual party, in which
case I like not to go at all. And so it is that I watched the third series of
The Traitors, having not watched the first two (even then, I didn't pick this
one up from the very start).
A
couple of quick takeaways.
Firstly,
people, even people who believe themselves to be en vogue, are incredibly
change resistant. This series saw a couple of twists, variations on how the
game was played in the first two series (in part to keep the game fresh; in
part, I'm sure, to generate exactly the kind of response it achieved) and a
whole lot of viewers were up in arms. Even though this is a game of twists, we
want the format to remain unchanged. We like the pretence of being in control
that knowing the rules of the game gives.
Secondly,
collectively we enter into an agreement to play the game. As far as I know
(though I admit I did not go looking and so I may be wrong) the media respected
the format. That is, although the series was filmed some time before it was
broadcast (and was broadcast over a much longer time than the game took to
play) the media did not report who had won (at least, even if that information
could be found somewhere, you could engage with the media without finding out).
The news media took the traditional roles of reporting, for the record, what
had taken place the day before (the day before, in this case, being a conceit,
but still) and offering editorial thoughts on what might unfold next; as
opposed to the more usual current role of informing us today what someone in
the public eye is going to do (e.g. leaking extensive content of a Prime
Ministerial speech a couple of days before they deliver it). And this meant
that we were all in a traditional and now increasingly unfamiliar role as
consumers of media, held in time (not real time, as the series had already been
filmed, but common time). If you chose not to watch an episode as it was aired,
or if you had no choice but to catch up later, you had to avoid finding out
details the next day that would spoil your viewing; but you were essentially in
the traditional place of a newspaper reader who only got their newspaper a
couple of days after the events it was reporting. This agreement, this holding
of common time in a world of on-demand media consumption, also gives us a sense
of security, which is illusionary but an effective placebo.
No comments:
Post a Comment