Angels have a certain
‘currency’ in our pluralist society, which, to the frustration of some, is both
post-Christian and post-Secular. The form with which we have envisaged angels
has changed many times – angels are ubiquitous, but no longer Victorian angels
sitting on clouds wearing white nightgowns and playing harps; which were in
their time quite distinct from Mediaeval angels – and this in itself points both
to an enduring ‘need’ for angels and to an evolutionary impulse that ensures
their survival.
Let’s be honest: our
current love of angels owes a lot to Robbie Williams. His career was sinking
without trace when ‘Angels’ catapulted him to super-stardom. It is played at
christening parties, weddings, and funerals, with ‘angel’ becoming the ‘perfect’
human form – baby, bride, departed loved one – a fantasy. The official video is
both revealing and disturbing: Robbie’s angel is a beautiful and passive woman
who provides a means of avoiding any troubling introspection. Unlike an
ordinary (real) woman, this fantasy does not demand reciprocity, to be treated
as a human being; her acceptance of who he is neither asks for nor empowers
change, but colludes in the status quo.
Here, the salvation being offered is simply the resuscitation of a flagging
ego; but there is no possibility of relationship, as we locate ourselves in an
eternal present moment, without shared past or hope of a shared future.*
The writers of Dr Who brilliantly subverted the angel
image with the Weeping Angels, aliens who take the form of ‘angel’ statues,
moving at terrifying speed when their victim blinks – don’t blink! – and
killing by transporting you to another time in which to grow old and die, separated
from your loved ones. Are angels comforting, or frightening? Perhaps our
turning people into angels separates us from the difficult but life-giving
relationships with flesh-and-blood humans?
Just up the road from
us, in Gateshead, stands the Angel of the North. It is an iconic image of North
East England. Sculptor Antony Gormley said this:
“People are always
asking, why an angel? The only response I can give is that no-one has ever seen
one and we need to keep imagining them. The angel has three functions – firstly
a historic one to remind us that below this site coal miners worked in the dark
for two hundred years, secondly to grasp hold of the future, expressing our
transition from the industrial to the information age, and lastly to be a focus
for our hopes and fears – a sculpture is an evolving thing.”
This Angel resonates
with our need for angels. But Gormley unpacks that need in terms of a
disruption – travellers going about their everyday business pass this angel at
a rate of more than one person per second – that connects us to the past, to
the future, and to our hopes and fears.
And this disruption,
and those particular connections, seem to me to make the Angel a good place to
start Advent (which begins on Sunday) – with its stories filled with angels…
*“Desire’s balancing point
between past and future means that it can only exist as a gift nourished by a
promise.” Revd Dr Jessica Martin, prologue to the Pilling Report (Report of the
House of Bishops Working Group on human sexuality), p. xv.
No comments:
Post a Comment