For
the record, thoughts originally posted on Facebook over the past 24 hours:
-----
Yesterday,
the Prime Minister mistakenly identified the public mood as confused. Today,
Dominic Cummings rightly named it as anger, and as justifiable anger, but
claimed that it is misdirected anger: we are angry because we have listened to
inaccurate reporting by the media, and so he would put the record straight.
I
choose to take his statement concerning what he did and why he did it at face
value. I have sympathy for him. And I remain dismayed that he is unrepentant.
At
a time of national crisis, he, the architect of government policy, failed to do
his civic duty at the first hurdle. He then used the hurdle to justify his
failure; broke both the letter and the spirit of the law; and blamed the media
for reporting a story in the public interest without full knowledge of the
facts in the face of dissembling rather than transparency from 10 Downing
Street.
What
was asked of us is clear, regarding the self-isolation of those who have C-19
symptoms in their own home at which they were resident at the time, and the
quarantining of all household members. Rightly, an exception was made for any
parent who came down with such symptoms and was living with a violent partner,
who feared for the welfare of their child not because of coronavirus (which
appears to affect children differently) or hunger (thousands of people have
signed up to deliver food to isolating households) but because of domestic
violence. This provision meant that the police could not prevent anyone in such
circumstances from leaving their home, nor could local councils or shelters
turn them away on account of their condition. Sadly, circumstances across the
nation have shown that this exception was and is needed. But Cummings has
broken both the letter and the spirit of the matter.
There
is no shame in not having the strength of character to deal with a national,
indeed international, emergency. None at all. But to not see it is a tragedy.
And a missed opportunity that stores up future tragedies. And to not have
friends around you who can help you to see that is perhaps the greatest tragedy
of all.
-----
Today,
several bishops of the Church of England have received threats, ranging from
people threatening to leave the Church to death threats, for criticising the
government. Including quite literally at least one member of the House of Lords
being told to stay out of politics, or it will be the death of you.
If
you feel so strongly that the Church should remain quiet, then please do go
ahead and leave. It is a free world, and we are not a private members’ club.
-----
STAY
AT HOME > PROTECT THE NHS > SAVE LIVES
We
were explicitly told not to travel to quieter parts of the country to
self-isolate, in case, should we become ill, we place an additional burden on
local hospitals.
By
his own account, Dominic Cummings’ London-based family had to draw upon the
resources of a Durham hospital.
The
government are mocking the people.
The
Conservative Party has a very large majority in parliament. We need to see a
very, very significant back bench rebellion. Public silence speaks to the
character of every MP.
So
far we have heard a few brave voices. This morning, a junior Minister has
resigned his post in protest. May this be the beginning.
-----
In
the light of the Dominic Cummings affair, I want to reflect on Jesus’
instruction that whoever is without sin cast the first stone (John
chapter 8).
The
first thing that I note is that Jesus was responding to a group of powerful men
who were calling for someone to be put to death. To my knowledge, no
representative of the Church of England has suggested, on or off the record,
that Dominic Cummings be killed for what he has done; but that he be removed
from his post. I am, however, aware that several Church of England bishops have
received death threats for speaking out against the government; which is a
consequence of the populism Dominic Cummings has carefully cultivated.
The
second thing I note is that Jesus fronts down a group of powerful men who have
broken both the letter and the spirit of the law.
They
claim that the Law of Moses demands that this woman, caught in the very act of
adultery, be stoned to death. This is a subtle, or not-so-subtle, revision. The
law was understood to instruct that, under certain circumstances, a couple
found guilty of adultery be put to death; but they have not brought the man to
justice. They have broken the letter of the law.
Moreover,
they have broken the spirit of the law. The spirit of the law is concerned with
the need a society has for trustworthiness, truthfulness and integrity; and
that, for the sake of the common good, those who believe that the law does not
apply to them are not accommodated. As far as we can tell, in Jesus’ day, the
spirit of the law was enforced far more than the letter. However, in bringing
this woman before Jesus, these powerful men are abusing the spirit of the law
in order to score points against him.
Of
course, the woman has also broken the letter and the spirit of the law, another
part of the law, the law prohibiting adultery; and, again, Jesus calls her to
repentance.
The
third thing I note is that Jesus begins to write, in the public space in which
all this is unfolding. We don’t know what he writes, but we do know that he
keeps writing until every last powerful man who thought that it was a good idea
to associate themselves with this travesty have realised that their position is
indefensible, and conceded as much in public. Only then does Jesus stop
writing.
The
fourth thing I note is that Jesus didn’t go looking for this confrontation, but
neither did he ignore it. I have far better things to do with my time, caring
for hurting people living in previously unimaginably hard circumstances, than
use the written word to shame powerful men who show a disregard to the letter
and spirit of the law at the cost of others. But, for the sake of those people
I am called to serve, and following the example of Jesus, I can’t ignore this.
Were
I to do so, I would in effect be adding my own metaphorical stone to the
pelting of already hurting people.