At
the moment, we are reading through Ezra
in Morning Prayer. The back story is this: Solomon had built a great temple to
the Lord in Jerusalem, which was one of the wonders of the world; the
Babylonian Empire arose, and defeated Solomon’s descendants, taking the people
into exile, in waves, and eventually destroying the temple; the Persian Empire
arose, defeating the Babylonians and freeing all captives to return home, in
order to rebuild economically productive vassal states; the Jews returned to
Jerusalem, in waves, the first wave building a new temple (under Zerubbabel),
the second wave being a mass return of people (under Ezra), and the third wave
rebuilding the city walls (under Nehemiah).
This
morning we read Ezra chapter 3, which
ends:
‘And
all the people responded with a great shout when they praised the Lord, because
the foundation of the house of the Lord was laid. But many of the priests and
Levites and heads of families, old people who had seen the first house on its
foundations, wept with a loud voice when they saw this house, though many
shouted aloud for joy, so that the people
could not distinguish the sound of the joyful shout from the sound of the
people’s weeping, for the people shouted so loudly that the sound was heard
far away.’ [emphasis mine]
It
is easy to read this as offering a choice that has to be made: between joy and
sorrow; between lamenting the past and welcoming the future; between nostalgia
that blinds us to what God is doing today and eyes of faith that can see God at
work even in the smallest of beginnings. Even as the people rejoice, there are
naysayers, who will not join in.
That
would certainly be the way to read this text through the cultural lens of an obsession
with youth.
But
life is more complex than that.
The
past is not uniformly better than the present. Nor is the present uniformly
better than the past.
The
young rejoice that they have, at last, for the first time in their lives, a
home of their own. They rejoice that they have, at last, a place to worship in
a way that is fitting to them.
The
old rejoice that they have lived to see God bringing his people back home, out
of exile. That God had not forgotten them, or abandoned them, even if he had
humbled them. They rejoice that the young will have a future in a place of
their own, and because they see a desire among the next generation to worship
God.
But
they also weep for what has been lost, and will not be again; even as they
rejoice at what has been done and will be. The
two responses are simultaneous. They co-exist. They cannot be distinguished.
It
is not a matter of choosing between
joy and sorrow; between lamenting the past and welcoming the future; between recognising
what was, and is, and is to come. It is a matter of choosing to embrace – and choosing to allow ourselves to be embraced by
– both joy and sorrow; both lamenting
and welcoming; both loss and gain.
It
is the difference between judging one another across the generations, and
honouring one another across the generations. There is a wisdom to these ‘old
people’ (which is not true of all old people) – a wisdom they can invite ‘young
people’ into, because even though the young have not shared the exact history,
that history is their heritage, their (old and young) shared story.
The
verses immediately before the ones I cite above record a time of worship in
which the people ‘sang responsively, praising and giving thanks to the Lord,
‘For
he is good,
for
his steadfast love endures for ever towards Israel.’
Perhaps
only those whose faith allows joy and sorrow, lamenting and welcoming, loss and
gain, can sing these words from the heart.
No comments:
Post a Comment