I
have just been on a week-long training course on ‘Transforming Church Conflict’
run by Bridge Builders. It was the
best training course I have ever been on. The content, and delivery, were
excellent; the team facilitating the course, first-class. But what made it so
significant and so helpful was this:
so much of what I am encouraged to focus on as a church leader (mission,
growth, discipleship) can seem esoteric to others, passions specific to my role
and my vocation, hard to relate to; but everyone
can relate to the experience of conflict, in family life, between partners,
at work, on soap operas, on the streets, in the news...
The
Bible is full of conflict. In fact, you can see conflict, in some form or
other, in every story, on every page. To some, that is clear evidence that
religion is a root of conflict, that religious texts promote and perpetuate conflict.
To others, it is deeply embarrassing, especially in the light of so much
conflict between followers of Jesus today; more than that, I know many
Christians who believe that our internal conflicts within the Church detract
from our mission to share the love of God.
I
would suggest that conflict is inherent
to life, and that the Bible is full of conflict because it is fully
concerned with life. I would also suggest that the accounts of conflict found
in the Bible are very much concerned with how
conflict might be transformed so that something good is brought forth, something
it was not previously possible to imagine into being, even (especially) where
there is no quick fix.
As
such, the Bible is a great resource concerning how we might respond to
conflict; and the Church has both great opportunity and no little experience to
offer the world an ongoing ministry of
reconciliation.
The
following posts do not cover the content of the course I have been on, but are
my own reflections on conflict in the Bible and
our attitude towards it, having been on the course. In my next post, I want
to begin to reflect on the opening chapters of the Bible, from this particular
perspective.
No comments:
Post a Comment