There
are two great legendary heroes in English folklore: king Arthur, and Robin
Hood. Both corpuses rise in times of national identity-crisis, and both look
back to an earlier time of identity-crisis we might identify with.
The
tales of king Arthur are set in the fifth century, in a time when Roman rule had
given way to a weakened Romano-British culture (when the official machinery of
empire drew back to defend Rome itself, what was left was Roman colonialists
who had intermarried with the Celtic tribes the had earlier conquered) which
was itself facing the threat of a new wave of invaders, the Saxons. But the
tales of king Arthur establish themselves in the twelfth century, when the
recently arrived Normans were trying to establish their cultural conquest of
the (by now) Anglo-Saxons. (Can you see a pattern?)
The
tales of Robin Hood are set in the twelfth century, in the historical period
when the tales of king Arthur were gaining currency. But these tales of Robin
Hood take captive the collective imagination in the fifteenth century, towards
the end of the Hundred Years’ War with France, in which England had taken
control of most of France, and lost it again; and had established a booming
economy based on control of the international wool trade, only to fall to
impending military defeat and, in the uncertainty, plunging into recession.
Later
still, in a time of political and religious upheaval, William Shakespeare would
turn to one of the high-points of the Hundred Years’ War—the English-Welsh
defeat of the French at the Battle of Agincourt—to give us another folk hero, Henry
V.
This
is how folklore works. It tells a story from the past that addresses the crisis
of the present in such a way that we can identify the hero-protagonists as ‘us’—even
though they are many steps removed from ‘us.’ It tells us, if we have overcome crisis
before, we can do so again. But it does not give us tactics. Rather, folklore
gives us a story by which we can take hold of a thread—an unbroken thread—that
runs from the past to the present and on into the future. Something of
continuity of identity will survive, folklore tells us, even if much inevitably
evolves. The genius of story—as opposed to tactics—is how adaptable story is,
how capable it is of being brought to bear in any number of contexts.
Thus,
the stories of king Arthur and of Robin Hood gain renewed currency in a later
age when the English, shaken by total war, are losing their own modern Empire.
Thus, they find new retellings in film and television. Thus, they have an
appeal to English nationalists, who believe themselves to be under threat from
invading waves of immigrants speaking unintelligible tongues, bringing foreign religions
and alien values...
Folklore
gives us truth that is greater than the sum of its bare facts, not least by
revealing to us our deepest selves. What is it that we fear, in the crisis
we face? And what inspires the faith that gives us hope? What we do with
those stories takes in the good, the bad, and the ugly.
Not
dissimilar to the English, a community displaced from Jerusalem (and later
returning, in part, and in three waves) in the sixth century BC and fifth
century BC wove folklore of patriarchs and liberators, of local tribal military
leaders writ large, of the coalescing and fragmenting of a kingdom, of a Golden
Age lost but perhaps not gone forever. Like Arthur and Robin and King Henry the
Fifth, there is history at the core, but embellished in the telling for a
particular purpose, in the tales of Abraham and Moses, Samson and Deborah, David
and Elijah. Of Esther and Daniel, stories set even in the jaws of exile. And
more, so many more, a cast of thousands.
A
network of little communities scattered across the Roman Empire and against the
backdrop of the siege and fall of Jerusalem (yet again) retold those stories,
this time bringing in a new hero, one not lost in the mists of time but who
lived among them in the actual lifetime of the story-tellers. Jesus of
Nazareth, and his band of followers, the mercurial Peter, the crazy Paul; Mary,
whom he had liberated from seven demons, and to whom he appeared first when he
was raised from the dead, a thing verifiable by many witnesses prepared to die
for its truth. Moses, David, Elijah, all point now to Jesus. And the telling of
his story, too, takes on the form of folklore, of memorable episodes we might
tell over and over again and identify with in a wide range of crises.
Two
thousand years on, these are stories that shape not national imagination and
identity but, rather, that of a global kingdom; one that has taken local expression
across time and space, down through centuries and criss-crossing continents.
They are far greater and untameable than Arthur or Robin, both of whom, some
say, will come back one day, in our hour of greatest need...
God
so loved the world that he gave us a folk-story. Or, rather, a library full of
them. And then breathed life into it, and stepped out of the pages.
For
Christians, it is to these stories that we are invited to return, in the crises
of our times, not for escapism but to discover, in how we retell them afresh,
the truth of the matter: who on earth are we, now, we citizens of the
kingdom of heaven?
No comments:
Post a Comment