Here in the UK there will be a
General Election on 04 July. Over the five Sundays in June, I intend to look at
several key issues relating to how we vote, continuing, today, with housing,
transport, immigration and education. My intention is not to tell you who you
should or shouldn’t vote for—though I will touch on policies—but to ask how
does Christian faith inform how we cast our vote?
In September 2023 the world-famous
Sycamore Gap Tree was felled in an act of vandalism. The outpouring of grief
made it very clear that many, many people across the northeast of England, and
far beyond, felt a special connection with this one, iconic, tree, a deep bond
that is hard to explain to someone who does not share it, but undeniable. There
is a real sense of loss, but also hope, a desire that the tree might have a
legacy: the stump, left in the ground, will hopefully sprout again; seedlings
have been carefully gathered and stored to produce new trees, through grafting
and other methods; and the felled trunk and branches have been preserved in
hope that commissioned artists will create works to enhance a wide variety of
contexts across the region.
Human connection to trees is nothing
new. In the Bible, trees are often used as allegories for people, sometimes
rulers and sometimes nations. Sometimes these trees are transplanted or cut
down. For example, the prophet Ezekiel does this in chapter 17—from which our
first reading this morning is an extract—and again in chapter 31. The cedar in
chapter 17 is an allegory of the fortunes of Judah, while the cedar in chapter
31 is an allegory of the fortunes of Egypt.
Under king Saul, and then king David,
a federation of tribes became a nation. The reign of David’s son, Solomon, was
considered a Golden Age. Their neighbour to the immediate north was the island
city of Tyre, jewel of the sea. Tyre controlled the great forests of Lebanon,
that produced the finest cedars. They used this resource to build fine ships,
becoming legendary merchants. But they had no land for growing cereal or
farming animals. David and Solomon made alliances with king Hiram of Tyre, supplying
food in exchange for cedarwood—and master craftsmen—to build David’s royal
palace and Solomon’s temple: and so, the cedar became a symbol of the king in
Jerusalem too.
But after Solomon’s death, the
kingdom split in two, Israel in the north declaring independence from Judah in
the south. The two nations coexisted for some time, until, in 597 BCE,
Nebuchadnezzar II of the Neo-Babylonian empire—known as the Great—besieged and
captured Jerusalem, carrying king Jehoiachin, the royal court and king’s own
regiments, into exile in Babylon. Nebuchadnezzar put Jehoiachin’s uncle,
Mattaniah, on the throne in his place; and Mattaniah take the name Zedekiah.
But ten years later, in 587 BCE, Zedekiah rebelled against Babylonia, gambling
on an alliance with Egypt. The gamble did not pay off: Jerusalem was besieged
for a second time, its walls destroyed, Solomon’s temple burnt down, and the entirety
of the remaining population carried off into exile in Babylon. There they would
remain until Babylon in turn fell to the Persians under Cyrus the Great, when
they would return, in three waves: led by Zerubbabel, who began rebuilding the
temple; by Ezra, the reformer; and by Nehemiah, who oversaw the rebuilding of
the walls of Jerusalem.
This is what is alluded to in
Ezekiel’s allegory of the tree: in the earlier part of the chapter, an allegory
of Nebuchadnezzar establishing Zedekiah in Jerusalem, and Zedekiah turning to
Egypt to support his rebellion; but towards the end of the chapter, the Lord
God promises that he will replant his people in their own land and restore
their fortunes. They will become a shelter for all nations (birds) and through
them all nations (trees, again) will come to know that the Lord is God.
Trees can be considered an ecosystem
in their own right. Our two native species of oak—the English Oak, national
tree of England; and the Sessile oak, national tree of both Wales and Ireland—support
2,300 wildlife species, providing food and shelter for insects, birds and
mammals, as well as lichens, mosses, and fungi. Likewise, the Scots Pine—our
only native pine, and the national tree of Scotland—is a keystone species, supporting
many other, including rare, species. Trees are a complex, living infrastructure,
which make them a good analogy for infrastructure issues such as housing,
transport, immigration, and education.
There is a need for a new vision for
housing in the UK, including, crucially affordable housing. The average house
value has risen by an average 10% every year for the past fifty years, leaving
our housing stock beyond the reach of younger first-time buyers. The
Conservative and Labour party manifestos share a commitment to build 1.6 &
1.5 million homes over the course of the next parliament. Labour and the
Liberal Democrats both propose a new generation of new towns or garden cities,
while the Greens favour smaller scale development. The left-of-centre parties want
developers to provide supporting infrastructure, while the right-of-centre parties
want to remove this constraint. Some focus more than others on upgrading
existing housing to be more energy efficient. Regarding the relationship
between landlords and tenants, those on the right want to strengthen the rights
of landlords, while those on the left want to strengthen the rights of tenants.
The imagery of a tree that supports a rich variety of life in different ways,
including nests on branches or hollowed out of dead wood, and sets and burrows
within the roots, speaks to a diversity of innovative solutions.
A reliable and fit-for-purpose transport
infrastructure is essential if communities are to flourish. Our rail network is
key, and all parties are calling for its reform. Labour, the LibDems, and the
Green party all call for public ownership; while Reform UK proposes that 50% of
our infrastructure be publicly owned and 50% held by a UK pensions fund. Buses
are key to connecting local communities, raising questions about
fit-for-purpose services are best planned, paid for. The LibDems vison extends
to light rail and trams, moving to zero-emissions, shifting more freight from
roads to rail, and—in common with the Greens—banning short domestic flights and
a moratorium on new airports. Cycleways and footpaths should be integral to
urban planning.
Immigration is a thorny issue.
Claiming that asylum seekers are illegal migrants is a deflection. An illegal
migrant is someone who came into the country on a travel, work or study visa
and who remained in this country after their visa expired. Illegal migrants
should be sent home. Safe routes to sanctuary must be reestablished for those
fleeing persecution. There is both compassion and economic sense in processing
claims quickly, allowing those who are granted asylum time to establish
themselves (currently they are made homeless within two weeks; the LibDems
propose a 60-day transition), and permitting people to work while their application
is being processed (Greens). The bigger issue is addressing legal migration:
and whether this is best done by a salary threshold (Conservative, currently £38,700
for a family visa) or a strategic workforce strategy identifying specific needs
and how to address them through balancing the training of our own population
and targeted immigration (Labour, LibDem).
Ezekiel’s vision of the tree included
the promise that, in a renewed society, the surrounding nations would come to
know that the Lord was God. This raises the question, what is the purpose of
education? What is it that we want our children to know? For what are we
shaping them? The world is changing, with new technologies advancing rapidly. A
primary role of our education system has long been producing a workforce. The
Conservative vision is built on rewarding STEM (science, technology,
engineering, and mathematics) subjects, fostering competition, replacing the
exam structure (yet again) with the Advanced British Standard, with pupils
spending more time in the classroom, studying more subjects, including English
and Maths to 18 years old. They also promise 100,000 more apprenticeships. Labour
look to fund investment in state schools through ending VAT exemption for
private schools. They aim to recruit 6,500 new teachers with a focus on areas
that present the greatest recruitment and retainment challenges; and address
systemic challenges through breakfast clubs and placing dedicated mental health
professionals in every school. The LibDems highlight professional development
for teachers, a richer curriculum for pupils, and the need to understand and remove
underlying barriers to attendance. The Greens would advocate for restoring
university grants and abolishing tuition fees; while Reform UK focus on banning
the teaching of ideologies they disapprove of in schools, while cutting funding
to universities that undermine free speech.
Having an imagination shaped by the
Hebrew Bible, as well as the land and its people, Jesus employed crops and
trees in his parables, including today’s Gospel passage, Mark 4.26-34. He notes
that while the sower scatters seed, the earth produces of itself, which the
sower harvests. Infrastructure issues are like this: we invest in certain ways;
what grows will grow; and later, we reap the fruit, the good and bad
consequences. With a General Election, a government inherits the consequences
of whatever someone else has sown. No party has a monopoly on the best ideas, nor
control over the soil in which they are sown. No party can take too much credit
for the success that follows their actions—the earth produces of itself.
Whoever forms our next government, they will face significant challenges and
address them as they see best, with mixed results. We must trust that God is at
work, through us, and ask how we might both love and bless our neighbour, however
small we may feel our agency to be, paying special attention to the most vulnerable.
Rather than saying, ‘What difference can one person make?’, attend to the tiny
mustard seed and the prolific tree that grows from it.
No comments:
Post a Comment